For the Culture By The Culture. ISSN: 3064-9331.
Federal law bans gun ownership for anyone labeled an “unlawful user” of cannabis, but it never clearly defines what that means. The result is a shifting standard that changes by circuit, by evidence, and by prosecutor. This feature breaks down the legal fog, the enforcement leverage, and why vagueness is the real power play.
Ohio voters approved adult use cannabis with 57 percent support in 2023. Two years later, lawmakers narrowed that framework through Senate Bill 56. A referendum campaign now seeks to overturn those revisions, requiring roughly 248,000 valid signatures statewide. This piece breaks down what changed, who changed it, and what voters are being asked to decide next.
THE CANNABIS LIE is a reporting series examining how cannabis policy turns shaky assumptions into hard penalties. In THE CANNABIS LIE: Vol. 2, The Fiction of Impairment, THC detection is often treated like proof of impairment, even though blood levels show a weak, inconsistent relationship to functional driving ability. This installment explains why per se THC limits and zero tolerance rules create false certainty, why urine metabolites only show prior exposure, and why real impairment should be demonstrated through behavior and context, not presumed from a lab result.
Nevada’s legal cannabis market runs in plain sight, yet unlicensed sales keep pace because the rules still leave openings. Price gaps, compliance costs, patchy access, and limited places to consume make the illicit channel feel easier for many buyers. This feature tracks what the numbers show, why raids only disrupt, and what actually shrinks underground sales.
A new study claims cannabis can be measured like alcohol using weekly limits and risk tiers. This feature dismantles that framework, exposing how alcohol math distorts cannabis science, ignores human biology, and fuels modern prohibition under the guise of public health. Numbers may comfort regulators, but they do not reflect reality.
Texas regulators are moving to eliminate smokable cannabis without passing a law. After lawmakers failed to ban THC products, state agencies rewrote testing standards and imposed crushing fees that push legal cannabis out of reach. The result is prohibition by process, driven by selective morality, political pressure, and regulatory maneuvering.