Filed Under: Trust Burn ✦

Cannabis was supposed to be the safer choice. That was the pitch, the promise, and the cultural truth people carried into the legal market. But safety only works if the companies behind the products give a damn about the people consuming them. In Colorado, three firms just showed what happens when that trust collapses. Nuka Enterprises, Sima Sciences, and Nuka Properties, the entities behind the 1906 “Midnight Drops,” agreed to a settlement after regulators tied their products to reports of liver injuries. They were fined four hundred thousand dollars and ordered to halt operations in the state, with the possibility of returning under conditions that were not detailed publicly.
This is not a plant story. It is a betrayal story. “Midnight Drops” were pitched as a cannabis sleep aid. Capsules packed with THC and herbal extracts, the kind of glossy product that ends up on boutique shelves and in slick ads aimed at wellness seekers. The companies promoted them heavily beginning in 2016, promising relaxation without risk. By 2020, the first consumer complaints surfaced. The Colorado Department of Revenue’s Marijuana Enforcement Division and the Department of Public Health and Environment flagged the pills in 2023, noting concerns with herbal additives and potential liver injury. Regulators highlighted Corydalis in earlier batches and later Stephania extract containing L-THP in subsequent versions, both associated with elevated liver enzymes that can indicate acute injury.
The state ordered action on the product. According to the attorney general’s office, the companies failed to take adequate steps. Midnight Drops continued to be sold while risks remained under review. That is not a clerical error. That is neglect of responsibility. State filings say the companies failed to properly research the herbal compounds, failed to alert retailers, and failed to uphold basic standards of consumer protection. Midnight Drops remained on shelves not because cannabis itself was inherently dangerous, but because profit was prioritized over precaution.
Cannabis gets dragged through the mud every time this happens. The headlines will not read “Herbal Additives Cause Harm.” They will read “Cannabis Product Linked to Liver Damage.” That distortion is the poison. The industry pays the price for operators who treat legalization like a cash grab. The culture pays the price when prohibitionists weaponize the news to argue cannabis is unsafe. The consumer pays the price in hospital visits, medical bills, and lost trust.
It did not have to be this way. Colorado has been a leader in legalization for more than a decade. Regulators know the eyes of the nation are on them. Yet the notice of health risks in 2023 sat while the product stayed in circulation. Only after the attorney general filed suit did meaningful consequences follow. That looks less like proactive oversight and more like reactive theater, protecting appearances while the risks lingered.
The fines sound big, but four hundred thousand dollars is a marketing budget for some outfits. Even with penalties that could climb to one million dollars if terms are violated, the money does not match the alleged damage, and the settlement leaves the door open for a return if conditions are met. Which means this might not be an ending at all. It might just be an intermission until the spotlight fades.
advertisement
F O R T H E C U L T U R E B Y T H E C U L T U R E
The Drug Test Lie Finally Cracks in New Mexico
New Mexico’s Senate Bill 129 challenges the long standing assumption that a positive cannabis test equals impairment. By separating outdated drug testing from actual workplace safety, the bill aims to…
How Cannabis Can Cost You Your Gun
Federal law still allows cannabis use to strip Americans of firearm rights without proof of danger or misuse. As the Supreme Court weighs United States v. Hemani, courts are confronting…
Reefer Report Card Vol. 32: Kicking the Can Again
This week’s Reefer Report Card tracks a familiar pattern in cannabis policy: delay dressed as progress. Federal lawmakers punted again on hemp regulation, states flirted with dismantling legal markets, and…
advertisement
Here is what gets lost in the headlines. Cannabis has not been shown to directly cause liver injury in this case. These capsules were not just cannabis. They were cannabis combined with under-researched botanicals, marketed without comprehensive testing, and left on shelves despite reports of harm. The issue was not the plant. It was corporate risk-taking. It was a system that allowed companies to push products until lawsuits or enforcement actions arrived.
Colorado’s consumers deserve better. They walked into dispensaries believing legalization meant oversight, quality, and transparency. What they got instead was a capsule that regulators later tied to potential harm. A product marketed as wellness but carrying hidden risks. A repeat of an old story, companies cutting corners, and regulators moving too slowly. The plant deserves better, too. Every scandal like this sets the culture back years. It hands ammunition to politicians eager to gut reform. It feeds headlines that echo louder than the truth.
The question is what happens now. Do other states take note and tighten standards before something similar occurs? Or do they wait until lawsuits knock at their doors? Do regulators finally move faster than the companies they are supposed to oversee? Or do they continue issuing warnings while risky products stay on shelves?
For the cannabis community, the takeaway is simple. Trust is fragile. The industry is still young, still fighting for legitimacy, still under the microscope. One company’s negligence can taint the entire market. If legalization is going to mean more than tax revenue, it has to mean protecting consumers from precisely this kind of betrayal.
Colorado just pushed Midnight Drops out. That was overdue. But the story does not end with one brand or one settlement. The culture has to decide whether it will let glossy branding substitute for integrity, whether it will accept slow-walking regulators, and whether it will let prohibitionists seize the narrative every time a bad actor is caught.
Cannabis did not cause this mess. Corporate decision-making did. Regulatory inertia did. The sooner that distinction is made clear, the better chance the plant has of surviving the next smear campaign.
©2025 Pot Culture Magazine. All rights reserved. This content is the exclusive property of Pot Culture Magazine and may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the publisher, except for brief quotations in critical reviews.
F O R T H E C U L T U R E B Y T H E C U L T U R E
WHEN THE UN CAN’T STOP LEGAL WEED
As cannabis reform accelerates worldwide, the UN’s International Narcotics Control Board continues warning that decades old drug treaties still apply. This feature examines the INCB’s actual authority, the limits of treaty enforcement, and why global legalization is advancing despite institutional resistance rooted in prohibition era frameworks.
The Federal Hemp Blueprint That Isn’t
A proposed federal hemp framework is being sold as long overdue clarity for a chaotic market. But beneath the promise of order, the structure reveals rigid caps, unresolved enforcement questions, and a quiet shift of power away from states and smaller producers. We break down what the proposal does, what it avoids, and why the…
Reefer Report Card Vol. 31: The Retreat Becomes Routine
Reefer Report Card Vol. 31 examines a week where cannabis reform quietly retreated. Ballot rollbacks gained traction, federal action stalled, and patients remained unprotected. Legal weed stayed popular, but oversight weakened and accountability slipped. Another week where legalization survived while governance failed
Discover more from POT CULTURE MAGAZINE
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Leave a comment